From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-37352-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27246 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2005 18:38:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27218 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2005 18:38:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2005 18:38:36 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0LIca3Q005001
	for <binutils@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:38:36 -0500
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0LIcaO09424;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:38:36 -0500
Received: from dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.252])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j0LIcYZZ021974;
	Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:38:34 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  Add a second 'pinfo' member to mips_opcode to extend
	number of available bits
From: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
To: fnf@specifixinc.com
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <200501211235.14273.fnf@specifixinc.com>
References: <200501191519.59986.fnf@specifixinc.com>
	 <wvnmzv471xr.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com>
	 <1106243981.4970.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200501211235.14273.fnf@specifixinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:38:00 -0000
Message-Id: <1106332713.4962.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 12:35 -0600, Fred Fish wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2005 11:59, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 11:52 +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > > Just a suggestion (I've no authority here ;) but maybe it would
> > > be better to use names like INSN2_* for flags that apply to pinfo2?
> > > Less chance of using the wrong pinfo field accidentally.
> > 
> > Seems like a good idea to me.
> 
> OK, here is a patch to do that.  I'll apply it if it looks OK.

Looks mostly mechanical. Go ahead. :)

-eric