From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14696 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2005 01:10:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14662 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2005 01:10:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2005 01:10:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.corp.specifixinc.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D169E16792; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:10:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ia64: @ not allowed to start symbol? From: James E Wilson To: Jan Beulich Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1108084207.24473.136.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:05:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 08:27, Jan Beulich wrote: > * config/tc-ia64.h (LEX_AT): Include LEX_BEGIN_NAME. > (LEX_QM): Likewise. > ... OK. I found the use of "pc" as a parameter name in ia64_parse_name a little confusing, as every time I see pc I think program counter, but this has nothing to do with an object file address or the program counter. I think nextchar or nextcharP as used in some of the other target ports is a better parameter name. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com