From: James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64 unwind directive semantics
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1108151369.19527.24.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s20ca004.024@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 04:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>Indeed. What lead me to think these aren't, despite their name,
>stack-like was the fact that dot_alias, in its error path, has two
>invocations of obstack_free; according what you say (the later) one
>should be sufficient there...
Yes, an oversight. We only need one obstack_free call here.
> >If we want to be able to free these strings here, then we can't use
> >obstack to allocate them.
> Perhaps we should.
Or, alternatively, we can use a different obstack than notes. If we
have an obstack used for dot_rot only, then we know that it will be save
to free everything, and we can do it with one obstack_free call.
> >This one is safe, because we know that there are no other allocations
> on
> >the notes obstack since this string was allocated.
> After you stated the above, it would seem to me that this isn't safe
> either, because there is another (conditional allocation inbetween).
> Thus the order of these two needs to be changed.
If hash_insert fails, then dr did not get allocated to the hash table,
and hence it is OK to free it. However, looking again, I do see that
there is a possible problem with a dangling pointer. I believe we can
fix that by moving the "drpp = &dr->next;" assignment after the
hash_insert if statement, and putting "*drpp = NULL;" inside the if
statement.
Your solution of allocating name after dr is also acceptable.
> * config/tc-ia64.c (dot_rot): Add comment that name strings
> should
> be freed when wiping out previous state. Canonicalize names
> before
> use. ...
Thanks. This is OK.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-11 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <s20ca004.024@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
2005-02-11 23:15 ` James E Wilson [this message]
2005-02-11 15:58 Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-02 14:52 Jan Beulich
2005-02-11 1:39 ` James E Wilson
2005-02-02 13:56 Jan Beulich
[not found] <s1fa08eb.028@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
2005-01-29 1:49 ` James E Wilson
2005-01-28 9:43 Jan Beulich
2005-01-24 11:29 Jan Beulich
2005-01-28 3:52 ` James E Wilson
2005-02-02 8:16 ` Alan Modra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1108151369.19527.24.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com \
--to=wilson@specifixinc.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).