From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1698 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 16:44:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1665 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2005 16:44:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.5.72) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 16:44:48 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-44c7579f.dyn.optonline.net [68.199.87.159]) by mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IC900FLBT60J8@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for binutils@sourceware.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:44:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:05:00 -0000 From: Kristis Makris Subject: libelf from binutils ? To: binutils@sourceware.org Message-id: <1109004263.27517.18.camel@syd.mkgnu.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 Hello, I'm interested in reusing parts of the sources of some binutils (particularly objdump). Given that libbfd is available directly from the binutils source, it's interesting that a corresponding libelf is missing. Are there any plans for packaging such a library, or should one go the route of doing vendor imports of the elf includes etc from binutils and tracking updates to those ? There seems to be a separate libelf out there (http://packages.debian.org/testing/libdevel/libelfg0-dev) that is not coming from binutils sources. Any insight on this ? Thanks Kristis