From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3594 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 19:23:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3566 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 19:23:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 19:23:16 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1MJNGZA029422 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:16 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1MJNFK05348; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:15 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1MJND5s007051; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:14 -0500 Subject: Re: More MIPS testsuite fixes From: Eric Christopher To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <20050221155056.GA19151@nevyn.them.org> <20050221230621.GB900@bubble.modra.org> <20050221235443.GA25719@nevyn.them.org> <20050222004316.GB1757@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050222182917.GA23903@nevyn.them.org> <1109097368.5032.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:14:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1109100143.5032.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00519.txt.bz2 > I'd keep stuff like objcopy and objdump working to be able to do > conversions and verify they have actually worked. Otherwise I don't care > about ECOFF either. > I can agree with that. > But this is not the right mailing list for people that actually use that > stuff, so it may be quite a good idea to ask at a more appropriate forum, > like . I've asked the netbsd people already, if you (or Thiemo) would like to ask the linux people that'd be great. I think we can deprecate the assembler support, but keep the bfd support around. Likely, though, it'll bit rot quite a bit over the years unless someone uses it. -eric