From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2157 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2005 22:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2105 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 22:15:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 22:15:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.corp.specifixinc.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E173167EA; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:15:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror) From: James E Wilson To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: Alan Modra , Nick Clifton , Ben Elliston , binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <423A2ADB.6090807@au.ibm.com> <423ABA6A.4030409@redhat.com> <20050318122113.GY21148@bubble.modra.org> <1111177693.9897.18.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1111184137.9897.50.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:52:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 13:12, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Or perhaps we just need to move elf32-ia64.c from BFD32_BACKENDS to > BFD64_BACKENDS in bfd/Makefile.am. OK, thanks, I see the problem now. With 40-bit instructions, a few 80-bit instructions, 128-bit bundles, and 64-bit unwind info, it is easier and more convenient if we can assume a 64-bit type exists, even if this is a 32-bit target. Things could be fixed if we had to though, Alan fixed elfNN_ia64_relax_brl last month to work with a 32-bit bfd_vma. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com