ARM: Don't make noise about R_ARM_NONE relocs

ARM: Don't make noise about R_ARM_NONE relocs

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

This patch fixes a bug which was already present before my (pending) patch
for protected symbols; but that patch changes where to place the fix, so
this patch is dependent on it.

When we have an R_ARM_NONE relocation against a symbol, as the ARM assembler
uses for personality routines, we don't use the value of the symbol.  So no
need to complain if it is unresolved.  Relevant archive members will already
have been pulled in.

OK?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

2005-03-21  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

	* elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_final_link_relocate): Don't fail for
	unresolved symbols in R_ARM_NONE relocations.

Index: binutils/bfd/elf32-arm.c
===================================================================
--- binutils.orig/bfd/elf32-arm.c	2005-03-18 19:16:06.000000000 -0500
+++ binutils/bfd/elf32-arm.c	2005-03-18 20:12:45.000000000 -0500
@@ -2311,6 +2311,9 @@ elf32_arm_final_link_relocate (reloc_how
   switch (r_type)
     {
     case R_ARM_NONE:
+      /* We don't need to find a value for this symbol.  It's just a
+	 marker.  */
+      *unresolved_reloc_p = FALSE;
       return bfd_reloc_ok;
 
     case R_ARM_PC24:

Re: ARM: Don't make noise about R_ARM_NONE relocs

[Richard Earnshaw]

On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 20:53, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug which was already present before my (pending) patch
> for protected symbols; but that patch changes where to place the fix, so
> this patch is dependent on it.
> 
> When we have an R_ARM_NONE relocation against a symbol, as the ARM assembler
> uses for personality routines, we don't use the value of the symbol.  So no
> need to complain if it is unresolved.  Relevant archive members will already
> have been pulled in.
> 
> OK?

> 2005-03-21  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

        * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_final_link_relocate): Don't fail for
        unresolved symbols in R_ARM_NONE relocations.

OK