From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26050 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2005 19:32:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25601 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2005 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 19:32:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3IJWVOZ005041; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:32:31 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3IJWPO21665; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:32:25 -0400 Received: from dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com (dhcp-172-16-25-252.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.252]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3IJWMth019702; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:32:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] adjust libgloss addresses for 64-bit From: Eric Christopher To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, Paul Koning , ths@networkno.de, newlib@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <1113516346.4591.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050414223754.GI32470@hattusa.textio> <1113583817.4591.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050415171813.GG21496@hattusa.textio> <16991.64361.508338.807589@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1113852740.4560.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00490.txt.bz2 > > Whatever SGI's assembler expands them into? 8-) > > Well, but does it actually fit all the variations of -mabi=/-march= that > we implement? I have no access to that tool, so I can't tell... > No, but we can extrapolate a bit :) > Well, I'd rather warn about dangerous constructs. Agreed. -eric