From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5832 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2005 15:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5709 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2005 15:47:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout1.freenet.de) (194.97.50.132) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2005 15:47:06 -0000 Received: from [194.97.55.147] (helo=mx4.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1DOdtO-00082c-4H for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:47:02 +0200 Received: from j0ecd.j.pppool.de ([85.74.14.205] helo=[192.168.0.172]) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID rcrtems@freenet.de) (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.51 #8) id 1DOdtN-0004hs-Rf for binutils@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:47:02 +0200 Subject: Re: Binutils 2.15.97 available From: Ralf Corsepius To: Binutils List In-Reply-To: <4267C722.8010709@codesourcery.com> References: <20050420195054.GA28127@nevyn.them.org> <1114077255.18714.197.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <4267C722.8010709@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1114098420.26656.5.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 08:30 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Any chances to see these patches below applied to binutils-2.16 rsp. > > gcc-4.0? > > If this is approved for mainline, it can go in 4.0.1, but it's too late > for 4.0.0. In this case, this patch doesn't make any sense to be applied to binutils-2.16, because it would introduce inconsistencies to our toolchains. Could somebody please apply this patch to binutils-mainline (I don't have binutils write access), I will apply it to gcc when the tree reopens. Ralf