From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22883 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2005 11:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22716 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2005 11:20:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2005 11:20:29 -0000 Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3QBKK4G020633; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:20:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3QBKNmf032242; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:20:23 +0100 Received: (from rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j3QBKMiA032240; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:20:22 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha set sender to rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org using -f Subject: Re: Thumb32 assembler (1/69) From: Richard Earnshaw To: Zack Weinberg Cc: binutils In-Reply-To: <878y35q2em.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <878y35q2em.fsf@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: GNU Message-Id: <1114514422.32129.1.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:20:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00771.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 11:05, Zack Weinberg wrote: > The first thing I did to tc-arm.c was rearrange all the functions into > a logical order. The diff for this is unreadable and twice the size > of the file, so I'm instead attaching a gzipped copy of the file after > the change. > > zw > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > * tc-arm.c: General reorganization, no code changes. I think it would be good to get this patch committed to the mainline ASAP, especially since you've said that you wanted to commit all the patches in one go to the branch. This should help to minimise any merging difficulties later on. R.