From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7564 invoked by alias); 5 May 2005 00:35:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7532 invoked from network); 5 May 2005 00:35:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 May 2005 00:35:40 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.corp.specifix.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B30416AD6; Wed, 4 May 2005 18:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Patch for IA64 HP-UX build From: James E Wilson To: sje@cup.hp.com Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200505042357.QAA16422@hpsje.cup.hp.com> References: <200505042357.QAA16422@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1115253339.5426.180.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 01:58:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:57, Steve Ellcey wrote: > I hope there are no platforms where including both will cause a problem. Just checking gcc/system.h, I see that it has STRING_WITH_STRINGS and a configure check to set it. This support was added here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1998-08/msg00317.html which suggests that including both can be unsafe, but offers no proof. The configure test for this is ACX_HEADER_STRING which is in config/acx.m4, which also happens to be in the binutils tree. So it would be possible for us to use it here. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com