From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18714 invoked by alias); 5 May 2005 19:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18691 invoked from network); 5 May 2005 19:44:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 May 2005 19:44:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.corp.specifix.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC63A169E1; Thu, 5 May 2005 13:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Another HP-UX IA64 Build patch From: James E Wilson To: DJ Delorie Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200505051928.j45JSWuO026339@greed.delorie.com> References: <200505051751.KAA17543@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <1115316630.8413.20.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> <200505051928.j45JSWuO026339@greed.delorie.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1115322265.8413.74.camel@aretha.corp.specifixinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 19:47:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00204.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 12:28, DJ Delorie wrote: > > This is a libiberty bug. > It's not supposed to be. Yes, it isn't a bug. I over reached a bit while trying to explain the basename prototype confusion to Steve. The important part of my message was the bit at the end where I said we fix libiberty when and if it causes a problem. And since there is apparently no problem, I'm not recommending any fix. Other than perhaps adding __hpux__ to the list if Steve needs it. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com