From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-45465-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5858 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2006 15:49:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 5849 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2006 15:49:44 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:49:41 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (cam-owa1.emea.arm.com [10.1.255.62]) 	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k3IFn7uc013772; 	Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:49:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com ([10.1.255.211]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); 	 Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:49:07 +0100
Subject: Re: plt for arm gnu thumb
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: johnmc@sidsa.es, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20060418154515.GA13751@nevyn.them.org>
References: <4385.195.53.86.158.1145361498.squirrel@webmail> 	 <1145373227.14054.16.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> 	 <20060418154515.GA13751@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1145375346.14054.20.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:01:00 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 16:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I did once implement alternate PLT sequences which could target Thumb,
> even on v4t.  However, they are mighty awkward, so I would strongly
> prefer not to submit the patch.  John, are you really using v4t?

I'd prefer to see a patch that implemented the wrapping of the called
function rather than changing the PLT sequence... :-)

I'm not sure if --wrap xxx could be used to create suitable trampoline
sequences in a semi-automated mechanism.  Is there a way to achieve the
same effect through a linker script?

R.