From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5773 invoked by alias); 15 May 2006 13:37:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 5749 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2006 13:37:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from thelemkes.ca (HELO shoal.thelemkes.ca) (66.96.18.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:37:56 +0000 Received: from winch.thelemkes.ca (unknown [192.168.62.33]) by shoal.thelemkes.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E9340B51B; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:37:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: intl directory: gcc vs. src From: James Lemke To: Steve Ellcey Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200605112057.NAA14726@hpsje.cup.hp.com> References: <200605112057.NAA14726@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1147700272.6054.37.camel@winch.thelemkes.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 > What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use > the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about > whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so, > which one should be used? FWIW, I have always given preference to the gcc version. -- Jim Lemke jwlemke@wasabisystems.com Orillia, Ontario