From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26223 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2007 17:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26212 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2007 17:57:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from w099.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO bluesmobile.specifix.com) (64.220.152.99) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:57:11 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bluesmobile.specifix.com [64.220.152.99]) by bluesmobile.specifix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6015F3B90F; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Binutils 2.18 prep From: Jim Wilson To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: binutils@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070730165146.GA17514@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070322024838.GA4722@caradoc.them.org> <20070730165146.GA17514@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1185990009.3237.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-1.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 12:51 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Obviously that didn't happen. Let's try again. If you know of any > issues in HEAD that should not be in a stable release, please let me > know. Otherwise, I will tentatively plan: I've been a bit negligent with my IA-64 maintainership duties. I have some patches I need to review. I'm not sure if there is anything critical in there though. But I've got a month to get this straightened out, so this should be no reason to delay the branch. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com