From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF873858D28 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:42:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3DF873858D28 Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-258-xNGC8nXmPlqaYXIER7q9iw-1; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 06:42:54 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xNGC8nXmPlqaYXIER7q9iw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id v125-20020a1cac83000000b0037e3d70e7e1so2495815wme.1 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:42:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:cc:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dMrrdsehaBbvHD6hc4ApB9RJrBnyB2uQ5czqaqPadJg=; b=xRsaoTYlX1BywO08hD5WZKMSFw5OsLXoWwQbwF7ZPKUFS5X6s6QzmM2j+dM5EQCu7I S/dwDPnB1S6PC7g9aYKEVVic4H4DljIbEz4uH1+7dVrBi3J/+3TIPaMVjijmp7Xson27 kaD030dRotcWCA1MrANQ3+fQM/9g5k5tDKCwvD749eYUUmwnZw9RWMnpH27cbfgeCqCA z9+etWBtlmKWnQzd5zZUiNxee9i0ZeSUjQbBOlt+/4jK0wbKSx67j6XOwQNTLmIeuVSm xqYUksM/j1uELIHz+JaEdPYIA7j1me41i5Et5JcfcWy0PDkxNQ2WEJnUopKOOw9gHsSS 0Jbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/IwaESLD8WadwVhdr1VqkAt4NoJQErknWX1jQCjetQ1OmYzQz FFEQomH0dgl/Su54j8FNV2aucCHMf0WmWI1cWjt38h0paF0K06cwqUUmctobYShU9SJ134Y6vdr IpUeQrKa+GbJsBsjHxA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:45c4:0:b0:1f0:1683:afbf with SMTP id b4-20020a5d45c4000000b001f01683afbfmr15181824wrs.661.1646826172980; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:42:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFo6SADpaq5uOGtR1gHmwqb6vSFW27kuz2BETkvsRktsDgGweUi4XJ+51oNInCpqWmK749mA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:45c4:0:b0:1f0:1683:afbf with SMTP id b4-20020a5d45c4000000b001f01683afbfmr15181810wrs.661.1646826172762; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:42:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (adsl-2-solo-173-39.claranet.co.uk. [80.168.173.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m2-20020adff382000000b001f022ef0375sm1435490wro.102.2022.03.09.03.42.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Mar 2022 03:42:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11f7dfc6-a4b4-6b4c-ea1e-a100f398d5b1@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:42:51 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: Fix for bug 28924 To: Viorel Preoteasa , Alan Matsuoka References: <20220309052506.4000271-1-amodra@gmail.com> <20220309052506.4000271-3-amodra@gmail.com> <60ea0381-f92a-4c75-c07a-3f01baa1be90@gmail.com> Cc: Binutils From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <60ea0381-f92a-4c75-c07a-3f01baa1be90@gmail.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:42:58 -0000 Hi Viorel, > We have a fix for bug 28924. > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28924 > > The fix is very simple and involves very small changes (2 lines). How can we have this fix applied? If I send the changes could someone apply the fix? Please submit the patch to the binutils mailing list, so that it can be reviewed. It would also help if you can add a link to the email to PR 28924, once the email appears in the binutils mailing list archive. > I could also try to produce a test which does not depend on gcc that reveals the problem. The dependency on gcc make the test unreliable. That would be appreciated. A patch that includes a test is always better than one that does not. Cheers Nick