public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations
@ 2010-02-11  1:00 Viktor Kutuzov
  2010-02-11  1:04 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viktor Kutuzov @ 2010-02-11  1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug Kwan (關振德); +Cc: binutils

Hi Doug,

I'm thinking about implementing of the TLS relocations for ARM, because
it breaks my dances with the cross build (I need TLS_IE32 as minimum)
and I just trying to figure out -- do you do something in this
direction? I want to avoid any collisions with it.

-Viktor.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations
  2010-02-11  1:00 [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations Viktor Kutuzov
@ 2010-02-11  1:04 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
  2010-02-11  1:19   ` Viktor Kutuzov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Kwan (關振德) @ 2010-02-11  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vkutuzov; +Cc: binutils

I am working on the another problem that uses arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
If the projects uses TLS, I will do it but there is no current plan.

-Doug

2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I'm thinking about implementing of the TLS relocations for ARM, because
> it breaks my dances with the cross build (I need TLS_IE32 as minimum)
> and I just trying to figure out -- do you do something in this
> direction? I want to avoid any collisions with it.
>
> -Viktor.
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations
  2010-02-11  1:04 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
@ 2010-02-11  1:19   ` Viktor Kutuzov
  2010-02-16 18:21     ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viktor Kutuzov @ 2010-02-11  1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug Kwan (^[$Bop?6y~^[(B); +Cc: binutils

ok, got it. Thank you. 
I will do it then.

-Viktor

On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:04 -0800, Doug Kwan (^[$Bop?6y~^[(B) wrote:
> I am working on the another problem that uses arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
> If the projects uses TLS, I will do it but there is no current plan.
> 
> -Doug
> 
> 2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > I'm thinking about implementing of the TLS relocations for ARM, because
> > it breaks my dances with the cross build (I need TLS_IE32 as minimum)
> > and I just trying to figure out -- do you do something in this
> > direction? I want to avoid any collisions with it.
> >
> > -Viktor.
> >
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations
  2010-02-11  1:19   ` Viktor Kutuzov
@ 2010-02-16 18:21     ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
  2010-02-16 19:36       ` Viktor Kutuzov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Doug Kwan (關振德) @ 2010-02-16 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: vkutuzov; +Cc: binutils

When will you do that?  I tried to run the gold test suite natively on
an ARM system but I got errors because R_ARM_TLS_IE32 is not supported
:(

-doug

2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
> ok, got it. Thank you.
> I will do it then.
>
> -Viktor
>
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:04 -0800, Doug Kwan ( $Bop?6y~ (B) wrote:
>> I am working on the another problem that uses arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
>> If the projects uses TLS, I will do it but there is no current plan.
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>> 2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
>> > Hi Doug,
>> >
>> > I'm thinking about implementing of the TLS relocations for ARM, because
>> > it breaks my dances with the cross build (I need TLS_IE32 as minimum)
>> > and I just trying to figure out -- do you do something in this
>> > direction? I want to avoid any collisions with it.
>> >
>> > -Viktor.
>> >
>> >
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations
  2010-02-16 18:21     ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
@ 2010-02-16 19:36       ` Viktor Kutuzov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Viktor Kutuzov @ 2010-02-16 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Doug Kwan (^[$Bop?6y~^[(B); +Cc: binutils

I expected to start working with it this week, but it looks like I will
not be able doing it sooner than middle of the week. I got some problem
with gold after the latest update yesterday and I'm trying to understand
now where is the problem -- on my side or somewhere in the new changes.
I'll do it after I will solve this problem.

-Viktor. 

On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 10:21 -0800, Doug Kwan (^[$Bop?6y~^[(B) wrote:
> When will you do that?  I tried to run the gold test suite natively on
> an ARM system but I got errors because R_ARM_TLS_IE32 is not supported
> :(
> 
> -doug
> 
> 2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
> > ok, got it. Thank you.
> > I will do it then.
> >
> > -Viktor
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 17:04 -0800, Doug Kwan ( $Bop?6y~ (B) wrote:
> >> I am working on the another problem that uses arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
> >> If the projects uses TLS, I will do it but there is no current plan.
> >>
> >> -Doug
> >>
> >> 2010/2/10 Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov@accesssoftek.com>:
> >> > Hi Doug,
> >> >
> >> > I'm thinking about implementing of the TLS relocations for ARM, because
> >> > it breaks my dances with the cross build (I need TLS_IE32 as minimum)
> >> > and I just trying to figure out -- do you do something in this
> >> > direction? I want to avoid any collisions with it.
> >> >
> >> > -Viktor.
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-16 19:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-11  1:00 [GOLD][ARM] implementation of the TLS relocations Viktor Kutuzov
2010-02-11  1:04 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2010-02-11  1:19   ` Viktor Kutuzov
2010-02-16 18:21     ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2010-02-16 19:36       ` Viktor Kutuzov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).