From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30934 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2010 15:22:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 30906 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2010 15:22:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (217.140.96.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:22:15 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (cam-owa2.emea.arm.com [10.1.105.18]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id o8MFJPF9005082; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:19:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.1.67.25] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:22:11 +0100 Subject: Re: Release 2.21 - rough schedule From: Tejas Belagod To: binutils@sourceware.org Cc: Richard Earnshaw , Alan Modra In-Reply-To: <20100921003158.GL16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <48A902C2-D801-401E-8FC1-3E5179D66B70@adacore.com> <20100918025913.GG16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1284997687.13878.32.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100921003158.GL16874@bubble.grove.modra.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1285168931.19631.6.camel@e102484-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 01:31 +0100, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:48:07PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 12:29 +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > > arm-aout arm-coff arm-epoc-pe arm-linux arm-netbsdelf arm-none-eabi arm-nto arm-pe arm-symbianelf arm-vxworks arm-wince-pe > > > > So arm-linux isn't very interesting these days, and nor is arm-aout > > (which I'm surprised we still claim to support at all). But > > Deprecate it. If ARM maintainers aren't interested in a target it's > likely that users are better served by staying with an older version > of binutils. > > > arm-linux-gnueabi is very important (as its a primary GCC target). > > I think I stole the list of arm targets from Nick, quite a while ago. > Please suggest a better (preferably smaller!) list. > Hi, I'm trying to deprecate arm-aout in binutils are I can't seem to find a formal way of doing this. Any pointers would be helpful. Thanks, Tejas.