From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-68783-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24837 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2010 09:53:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 24825 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2010 09:53:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:53:37 +0000
Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21])	by service87.mimecast.com;	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:53:33 +0000
Received: from [10.1.77.49] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:53:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Release 2.21 - Pre tests
From: Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com>
To: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Cc: binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
In-Reply-To: <2FB8160A-5560-40C7-8E4F-1A0B7531B63B@adacore.com>
References: <B541D23F-CA95-4B9A-9DEA-DC8D7657CEC0@adacore.com>	 <2FB8160A-5560-40C7-8E4F-1A0B7531B63B@adacore.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1290592409.30662.14.camel@e102319-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 110112409533303001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00437.txt.bz2

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:32 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> here is the result of a first pre-test.  I still plan to update the targe=
t list.
>=20
> Two comments:
>=20
> 1) are the arm-eabi failures expected ?

These are due to this change:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-11/msg00012.html

which fixes: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D12001

I think the problem is with the test rather than the fix itself, and am
working through creating a patch - but I don't think it should hold up
the release.

Thanks,

Matt

--=20
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Principal Engineer - PDSW Tools
ARM Ltd