From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-70021-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 6952 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2011 00:25:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 6943 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2011 00:25:11 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (HELO g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com) (15.192.0.43)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:25:05 +0000
Received: from g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com [16.228.8.141])	by g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EA1C42E;	Sat,  5 Feb 2011 00:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [16.89.92.85] (hpsje.cup.hp.com [16.89.92.85])	by g5t0029.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D853D2028A;	Sat,  5 Feb 2011 00:25:02 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR binutils/12283: bfd/doc doesn't support parallel build
From: Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com>
Reply-To: sje@cup.hp.com
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110204063423.GC14132@gmx.de>
References: <AANLkTikAd7jWXN+2bi-OeR_-cQq7ivpSyVz+4165trVS@mail.gmail.com>	 <201101282332.p0SNWFT04949@lucas.cup.hp.com>	 <20110129094232.GD11288@gmx.de>	 <1296498781.12233.80.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com>	 <20110204063423.GC14132@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1296865501.12233.1357.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 07:34 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

> Still, I don't like the idea of requiring a configure switch in order
> for parallel builds to work; they should just work OOTB.
> 
> Maybe we can help things here by going through another indirection,
> that should avoid multiple simultaneous compiles of chew.c.
> 
> Does the (little-tested) patch below work for you?

It works fine for me.  chew is only built once so there is no problem.
> 
> Are you using GNU make by the way, or HP-UX make?  I can only warn
> against using the latter:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches/7535/focus=7548

I use GNU make.

Steve Ellcey
sje@cup.hp.com