From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12870 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2011 15:08:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 12862 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2011 15:08:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_OV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net (HELO lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net) (195.173.77.148) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:08:04 +0000 Received: from jsm-net.demon.co.uk ([80.176.88.36]) by lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1PzVqs-00019U-Wk; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:08:02 +0000 Received: (from jsm@localhost) by jsm-net.demon.co.uk (8.14.3/8.12.5/Submit) id p2FFB22A021659; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:11:02 GMT Subject: Re: 68hc11/12/s12x/xgate patch From: James Murray To: Nick Clifton Cc: binutils@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4D7F247D.6070303@redhat.com> References: <1298845471.12108.12.camel@jsm2> <1299515895.3262.1.camel@jsm2> <4D7F247D.6070303@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1300201861.20997.3.camel@jsm2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 08:34 +0000, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi James, > >> Attached is a patch for the 68hc11 target of binutils. > Thank you for the patch submission, Thanks for your comments. > First of all, I must point out that we do not appear to have a FSF > Copyright Assignment on file from you. This is essential in order for > us to be able to accept the patch. I have attached a form you can fill > out and email to the FSF should you wish to pursue this. I have sent one off, but I will re-send and check I completed my details correctly. > As for the patch itself, it is fine apart from one problem - it > introduces some new gas testsuite failures to the m68hc11-elf target. > Specifically: > > GAS REGRESSION: movb 200,x,3,y : Offset out I'll need to check the testsuite is operating correctly as these are areas I intentionally extended. The S12X CPU supports many more modes of movb/movw than the more basic 68hc11 and intermediate s12 I'll need to confirm that the testsuite is checking the correct target i.e. it might now need a 68hc11 flag. James