On 2/23/23 14:44, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 23.02.2023 14:27, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 2/23/23 14:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 23.02.2023 13:45, Tom de Vries via Binutils wrote: >>>> Gas has an option --compress-debug-sections that allows it to generate >>>> compressed debug sections. >>>> >>>> That does not guarantee that the debug sections are in fact compressed: >>>> ... >>>> $ gcc ~/hello.c -Wa,-gdwarf-5 -c -Wa,--compress-debug-sections=zstd >>>> $ readelf -S -W hello.o | grep " .debug" >>>> [ 9] .debug_line PROGBITS 0000a8 000053 00 0 0 1 >>>> [11] .debug_line_str PROGBITS 0000fb 000025 01 MS 0 0 1 >>>> [12] .debug_info PROGBITS 000120 000039 00 0 0 1 >>>> [14] .debug_abbrev PROGBITS 000159 000028 00 0 0 1 >>>> [15] .debug_aranges PROGBITS 000190 000030 00 0 0 16 >>>> [17] .debug_str PROGBITS 0001c0 000039 01 MS 0 0 1 >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Sensibly so, they're only compressed if that provides a size benefit. >>>> >>>> However, for the purposes of testing components consuming dwarf >>>> we may want the sections to be compressed regardless. >>>> >>>> Add a new option --force-compress-debug-sections that ignores the size >>>> heuristic, such that we have instead: >>>> ... >>>> $ gcc ~/hello.c -Wa,-gdwarf-5 -c -Wa,--compress-debug-sections=zstd \ >>>> -Wa,--force-compress-debug-sections >>>> $ readelf -S -W hello.o | grep " .debug" >>>> [ 9] .debug_line PROGBITS 0000a8 000064 00 C 0 0 8 >>>> [11] .debug_line_str PROGBITS 000110 000046 01 MSC 0 0 8 >>>> [12] .debug_info PROGBITS 000158 000046 00 C 0 0 8 >>>> [14] .debug_abbrev PROGBITS 0001a0 000049 00 C 0 0 8 >>>> [15] .debug_aranges PROGBITS 0001f0 000034 00 C 0 0 8 >>>> [17] .debug_str PROGBITS 000228 00005a 01 MSC 0 0 8 >>>> ... >>>> >>>> Advertised as: >>>> ... >>>> $ as --help 2>&1 | grep compress >>>> --compress-debug-sections[={none|zlib|zlib-gnu|zlib-gabi|zstd}] >>>> compress DWARF debug sections >>>> --nocompress-debug-sections >>>> don't compress DWARF debug sections >>>> --force-compress-debug-sections >>>> force compression of DWARF debug sections >>> >>> No objection in principle, but have you considered making this a new >>> sub-option to --compress-debug-sections, i.e. compress-debug-sections=force? >> >> I did consider adding a "force-" prefix variant for all the non-none >> sub-options, but decided to go with the simplest solution first. >> >> Your suggestion, --compress-debug-sections=force is more orthogonal, >> though it breaks the pattern that all the sub-options are mutually >> exclusive. >> >> We could have it be standalone, so you'd do: >> --compress-debug-sections=zstd --compress-debug-sections=force. >> >> Or instead combined: --compress-debug-sections=force,zstd. Harder to >> parse though, I suppose. > > I think both should be allowed. In a complex build system it may be > different entities setting "how" and "whether". (To me "none" falls in > the "whether" category together with "force", and it also can be seen > as falling in the "how" category together with "zlib" etc. In Linux > Kconfig, for example, I'd see this being expressed as first a "whether" > choice [yes/maybe/forced] and then a "how" choice dependent upon > "whether != none".) > I gave this approach a try. Thanks, - Tom