From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13841 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2002 07:12:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13830 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2002 07:12:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO deimos.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.19.190) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2002 07:12:35 -0000 Received: from hplms2.hpl.hp.com (hplms2.hpl.hp.com [15.0.152.33]) by deimos.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_24419)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id AAA26160; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (napali.hpl.hp.com [15.4.89.123]) by hplms2.hpl.hp.com (8.10.2/8.10.2 HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id g6H7CYk19516; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from napali.hpl.hp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g6H7CYuh001259; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:12:34 -0700 Received: (from davidm@localhost) by napali.hpl.hp.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Debian -5) id g6H7CYpm001255; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:12:34 -0700 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15669.6369.977119.738217@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:15:00 -0000 To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] important performance bug fix In-Reply-To: <20020716214914.A1444@lucon.org> References: <200207170157.g6H1vlfJ032230@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020716191953.A31705@lucon.org> <20020717023440.GA10190@nevyn.them.org> <20020716214914.A1444@lucon.org> Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:49:14 -0700, "H. J. Lu" said: HJ> David will be the first, if not the only, one affected by his HJ> ia64 change. I will check in his patch along with the gas HJ> testsuite change enlosed here after I finish "make check" in the HJ> combined gcc 3.1 and binutils tree on ia64. HJ> David, could you please double check my gas patch? Looks good to me. I applied it and "make check" didn't report any errors for the B-unit opcodes (there was one failure related to "movl", but that appears to be due to an off-by-2 bug in the disassembler. The generated code is correct. --david