From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17147 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2003 10:43:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17100 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 10:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO momotombo.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.136.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jul 2003 10:43:50 -0000 Received: from xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.137.35]) by momotombo.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6/TechFak/2003/04/16/pk) with ESMTP id h6TAhlb03133; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:43:47 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth Message-ID: <16166.20449.436697.731069@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:43:00 -0000 To: Rainer Orth Cc: Eric Christopher , Thiemo Seufer , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 In-Reply-To: <16165.35161.538188.987309@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> References: <16160.11824.994818.739106@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <20030724122929.A18059@synopsys.com> <1059075129.11394.0.camel@hex.sfbay.redhat.com> <20030724202651.GC9876@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <1059083206.11394.6.camel@hex.sfbay.redhat.com> <16165.34417.841407.578041@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <1059424361.9112.13.camel@hex.sfbay.redhat.com> <16165.35161.538188.987309@xayide.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00570.txt.bz2 Rainer Orth writes: > Eric Christopher writes: > > > > Mon Jul 28 22:12:55 2003 Rainer Orth > > > > > > * read.c (s_space): Don't warn about .space 0. > > > > Good for me. > > Thanks, installed. It has just been brought to my attention that this hadn't been an approval, but just an opinion on the patch. I had only looked in the toplevel MAINTAINERS file for a list of global-write-privs binutils maintainers, but neglected to consult gas/MAINTAINERS or binutils/MAINTAINERS (which unfortunately aren't listed in the toplevel file, unlike e.g. gdb/MAINTAINERS). What should I do about this patch? Revert, or is this ok nonetheless? Sorry about this. Rainer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University