From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14533 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2007 13:46:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14479 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2007 13:46:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exprod8og57.obsmtp.com (HELO exprod8og57.obsmtp.com) (64.18.3.96) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:46:46 +0100 Received: from source ([12.110.134.31]) by exprod8ob57.obsmtp.com ([64.18.7.12]) with SMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:46:34 PDT Received: from pkoning.equallogic.com ([172.16.1.108]) by M31.equallogic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:45:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17948.58999.765932.364602@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:46:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: drow@false.org Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: SVN for src (was Re: Binutils 2.18 prep) References: <46025531.90105@st.com> <20070322150018.GA4566@caradoc.them.org> <20070322152751.GA5538@caradoc.them.org> <4602A611.6060907@st.com> <20070326145736.GB23900@caradoc.them.org> <4607F1D1.8070200@st.com> <20070410172524.GA18853@caradoc.them.org> <461CB6DF.7050509@st.com> <20070411110637.GA10216@caradoc.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:22:23AM +0100, Andrew STUBBS Daniel> wrote: >> I would suggest now that the real problem is how to convert CVS to >> SVN. I haven't even got a clue how that could be done. The GCC >> project managed it, but I imagine that it will take a CVS expert >> some time to get that mammoth process completed. Daniel> Actually, that part is quite simple. cvs2svn is a very good Daniel> utility :-) Absolutely. I used it a bit over a year ago on a large project, and of course the GCC project did likewise. It was entirely painless. Just run it and admire the result. paul