From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30811 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2005 18:52:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30795 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Sep 2005 18:52:51 -0000 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:52:51 +0000 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so204336nfc for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.239.17 with SMTP id m17mr2060nfh; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.255.18 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <196b7d31050916115259b2014b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:02:00 -0000 From: Lior Balkohen Reply-To: balkohen@gmail.com To: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: --nfp configure option still alive? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 is the --nfp configure option still alive for targets which do not have an fpu or we can omit this option also for targets without fpu?