From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca Cc: nickc@cygnus.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Duplicate symbols in recent cvs source Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0000 Message-id: <19990604190012.9569.qmail@daffy.airs.com> References: <199906041852.OAA26748@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <199906041852.OAA26748@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00131.html Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 14:52:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "John David Anglin" gcc -O3 -s -o as-new app.o as.o atof-generic.o bignum-copy.o cond.o depend.o dwa rf2dbg.o ecoff.o ehopt.o expr.o flonum-copy.o flonum-konst.o flonum-mult.o frags .o hash.o input-file.o input-scrub.o listing.o literal.o macro.o messages.o outp ut-file.o read.o sb.o stabs.o subsegs.o symbols.o write.o tc-hppa.o obj-som.o at of-ieee.o ../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libib erty.a ./../intl/libintl.a /bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: _bfd_dwarf1_find_nearest_line (code) collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [as-new] Error 1 This routine appears to be in bfd/dwarf1.c. It appears to be missing from the bfd/Makefile. You're right, dwarf1.c was not correctly added to the BFD Makefile. I just checked in a patch. Ian