From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
To: Charles.Gauthier@iit.nrc.ca
Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: binutils newer than 2.9.1
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <19990609141744.2281.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
References: <375B60E2.3A7C2484@dgs.monash.edu.au> <19990607140936.1597.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <375C6236.D0348849@dgs.monash.edu.au> <19990609042043.1682.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <375E6552.7FD1EEF@iit.nrc.ca> <375E6552.7FD1EEF@iit.nrc.ca>
X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00193.html

   Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 09:00:02 -0400
   From: "Charles Gauthier" <Charles.Gauthier@iit.nrc.ca>

   We are using binutils 2.9.4 for m68k-rtemself (really elf32-m68k).

I just want to caution people against referring to any set of sources
as binutils 2.9.4.  There is no single set of sources which that
describes.  Some binutils which identify themselves as 2.9.4 will be
very buggy and unusable.  Some may work fine.

Ian