From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Henderson To: Mark Mitchell Cc: ian@zembu.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Patches for IRIX6 N32-ABI ld Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0000 Message-id: <19990626141816.A21368@cygnus.com> References: <19990626192703.9669.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <19990626134622L.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <19990626204616.9890.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <19990626140924Q.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <19990626140924Q.mitchell@codesourcery.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00361.html On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 02:09:24PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I assumed this to be non-controversial, and used things like > `SGI_COMPAT (abfd) == sct_irix6' throughout the rest of my patches. I have no problem with that. All I was looking for in the quoted patch was either `SGI_COMPAT (foo) == sct_none' or `SGI_COMPAT (foo) == sct_irix5' as appropriate. Especially since SGI_COMPAT had used to mean explicitly Irix5, and now that conditional is changed to Irix5 or Irix6. Which may be correct, but I want to know you meant it. r~