public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
To: hjl@lucon.org
Cc: mark@codesourcery.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Your change to ldlang.c
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 07:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990702142620.29296.qmail@daffy.airs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19990702065139.7A1CF57BA@ocean.lucon.org>

   Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
   From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)

   > Seems easy enough, but guess I'm missing something?
   > 
   >     Ian> Until quite recently (February 1999), .reginfo sections were
   >     Ian> not marked as LINK_ONCE, and they were instead handled in the
   >     Ian> emultempl file.  The special handling was removed by this
   >     Ian> patch:
   > 
   > I see.  If I can't persuade you that my interpretation of
   > SEC_LINK_ONCE is the One True Way :-), then may we revert this change?
   > 

   I believe this change is needed for Linux/MIPS. Check with the
   Linux/MIPS people before reverting it.

Actually, it was the Linux/MIPS people who suggested using LINK_ONCE
for .reginfo.  Once that is done, the change to elf32.em becomes no
longer necessary (modulo concerns about ld -r).  That is why they took
it out--not because they needed the change, but because other changes
they made meant that that code was no longer needed.

Ian

  reply	other threads:[~1999-07-02  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-07-01 17:54 Mark Mitchell
1999-07-01 19:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-01 20:25   ` Mark Mitchell
1999-07-01 20:34     ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-01 23:12       ` Mark Mitchell
1999-07-01 23:51         ` H.J. Lu
1999-07-02  7:27           ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
1999-07-02 16:31             ` Ralf Baechle
1999-07-02  1:00         ` Mikey
1999-07-02  7:25           ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-02  7:40         ` Ian Lance Taylor
1999-07-02 10:30           ` Mark Mitchell
1999-07-06 18:35           ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19990702142620.29296.qmail@daffy.airs.com \
    --to=ian@zembu.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    --cc=hjl@lucon.org \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).