From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
To: fnf@toadfish.ninemoons.com
Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: objdump patch to recognize core files
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:27:00 -0000
Message-id: <19990919222514.2980.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
References: <199909181724.KAA06632@toadfish.ninemoons.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-09/msg00130.html

   From: fnf@toadfish.ninemoons.com
   Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 10:24:00 -0700 (MST)

   Is there any good reason to NOT do something like this?

   Hmm, I just realized that if neither format matching call succeeds,
   the error will be determined by the attempt to match the bfd_core, so
   perhaps we need a different patch ...

I think this patch is fine provided you fix the problem you mention.
If bfd_object is ambiguously matched, then we need to report the
matching formats from bfd_object, not the matching formats (probably
none) from bfd_core.

Ian