From: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
To: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: 2.41 branch approaching
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:59:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e2ed114-8360-1954-27e2-fc916ba0ebc1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68dd52aa-0a66-d4ef-fc39-5c32ef330821@debian.org>
Hi Matthias,
>> Can you supply the binutils.log file for a failing test run so
>> that I can take a look ?
>
> attached, however it only points to the first fail in these two test cases.
Hmm, OK, so if I am reading the log correctly the addr2line failures are
happening because running:
addr2line -e tmpdir/testprog <some address>
returns:
./builddir-single/binutils/./binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/testprog.c:<some line number>
whereas the regexp is expecting to match:
"$srcdir/$subdir/testprog.c:\[0-9\]+"
which translates to:
/home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.40.50.20230628/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/testprog.c:[0-9]+
Looking back in the log I notice that the test program is being compiled
with:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc \
/home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.40.50.20230628/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/testprog.c \
-g \
-O2 \
-ffile-prefix-map=/home/packages/binutils/binutils-2.40.50.20230628=. \
-O0 \
-g \
-lm \
-o tmpdir/testprog
(I added the backslash line separators).
And so the culprit appears to be the -ffile-prefix-map... option. Which I think
must be coming from your environment as it is not a normal part of the binutils
testsuite.
Does this make sense ?
I suspect that the same problem explains why the objdump+source+listing tests
are failing. The sources are not where the built binaries are saying that they
should be.
Cheers
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 9:57 Nick Clifton
2023-06-21 18:29 ` Indu Bhagat
2023-06-26 5:34 ` Matthias Klose
2023-06-28 10:58 ` Nick Clifton
2023-06-28 15:21 ` Matthias Klose
2023-06-28 15:59 ` Nick Clifton [this message]
2023-06-28 16:27 ` Matthias Klose
2023-06-29 9:34 ` Matthias Klose
2023-06-29 11:44 ` Nick Clifton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e2ed114-8360-1954-27e2-fc916ba0ebc1@redhat.com \
--to=nickc@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=doko@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).