* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register
@ 2000-06-08 10:07 Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 10:13 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " David O'Brien
2000-06-09 0:45 ` Doug Rabson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2000-06-08 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dfr; +Cc: binutils, mjacob, obrien, gallatin
Hi Doug,
: David has asked me to comment on this minor patch to binutils to try to
: get it included in the 2.10 release. I have been working with the alpha
: architecture for several years and I did the original FreeBSD/alpha kernel
: port to this architecture.
I assume, although you do not mention this specifically, that you
would also like to see this patch go into the mainline sources as
well?
The patch itself is fine. If you can provide a ChangeLog entry then I
will be happy to check it into the repository.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 10:07 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register Nick Clifton
@ 2000-06-08 10:13 ` David O'Brien
2000-06-08 10:18 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto " Matthew Jacob
2000-06-09 0:45 ` Doug Rabson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David O'Brien @ 2000-06-08 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 10:07:13AM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> : David has asked me to comment on this minor patch to binutils to try to
> : get it included in the 2.10 release. I have been working with the alpha
> : architecture for several years and I did the original FreeBSD/alpha kernel
> : port to this architecture.
>
> I assume, although you do not mention this specifically, that you
> would also like to see this patch go into the mainline sources as
> well?
>
> The patch itself is fine. If you can provide a ChangeLog entry then I
> will be happy to check it into the repository.
I've already got a ChangeLog for it, it actually isn't Doug's patch.
If this is permission, I will commit it to HEAD and 2.10 branches.
If I am only cleared to fix it in HEAD please mention that too. :-)
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register
2000-06-08 10:13 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " David O'Brien
@ 2000-06-08 10:18 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2000-06-08 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David O'Brien; +Cc: Nick Clifton, dfr, binutils, gallatin
> I've already got a ChangeLog for it, it actually isn't Doug's patch.
It's jointly an O'Brien, Rabson, Jacob production.
> If this is permission, I will commit it to HEAD and 2.10 branches.
> If I am only cleared to fix it in HEAD please mention that too. :-)
>
> --
> -- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register
2000-06-08 10:07 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 10:13 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " David O'Brien
@ 2000-06-09 0:45 ` Doug Rabson
2000-06-09 10:00 ` Matthew Jacob
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Doug Rabson @ 2000-06-09 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils, mjacob, obrien, gallatin
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> : David has asked me to comment on this minor patch to binutils to try to
> : get it included in the 2.10 release. I have been working with the alpha
> : architecture for several years and I did the original FreeBSD/alpha kernel
> : port to this architecture.
>
> I assume, although you do not mention this specifically, that you
> would also like to see this patch go into the mainline sources as
> well?
Yes please.
>
> The patch itself is fine. If you can provide a ChangeLog entry then I
> will be happy to check it into the repository.
The ChangeLog would be something along the lines of:
Fix md_undefined_symbol() so that it does not confuse $f28
with $at and produce an irrelavent warning.
--
Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com
Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8442 9037
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register
2000-06-09 0:45 ` Doug Rabson
@ 2000-06-09 10:00 ` Matthew Jacob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Jacob @ 2000-06-09 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Rabson; +Cc: Nick Clifton, binutils, obrien, gallatin
> Fix md_undefined_symbol() so that it does not confuse $f28
> with $at and produce an irrelavent warning.
irrelevant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
@ 2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Philip Blundell @ 2000-06-08 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: binutils
>> This is approval for HEAD only.
>
>Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
>up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
Let's leave this one to 2.10.1 as well. I don't think it's a critical bug.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
@ 2000-06-08 12:14 Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2000-06-08 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: binutils
Hi David,
: Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
: up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
This is up to Philip Blundell to decide.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
2000-06-08 10:50 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " Nick Clifton
@ 2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David O'Brien @ 2000-06-08 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 10:49:59AM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> This is approval for HEAD only.
Is there still a chance for this to go into 2.10 if someone else speaks
up, or there is zero chance for it to into 2.10?
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to AT register
@ 2000-06-08 10:50 Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2000-06-08 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: obrien; +Cc: dfr, binutils, mjacob, gallatin
Hi David,
: I've already got a ChangeLog for it, it actually isn't Doug's patch.
: If this is permission, I will commit it to HEAD and 2.10 branches.
: If I am only cleared to fix it in HEAD please mention that too. :-)
This is approval for HEAD only.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-06-09 10:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-06-08 10:07 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto AT register Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 10:13 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " David O'Brien
2000-06-08 10:18 ` (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug relatedto " Matthew Jacob
2000-06-09 0:45 ` Doug Rabson
2000-06-09 10:00 ` Matthew Jacob
2000-06-08 10:50 (FWD) Re: ** potential patch for 2.10 ** DEC Alpha bug related to " Nick Clifton
2000-06-08 11:25 ` David O'Brien
2000-06-08 13:34 ` Philip Blundell
2000-06-08 12:14 Nick Clifton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).