From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Geoff Keating Cc: libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, ian@zembu.com Subject: Re: glibc 2.1 and gabi Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 23:22:00 -0000 Message-id: <20000720232218.A8811@lucon.org> References: <20000720114229.A6435@lucon.org> <200007202022.NAA15027@localhost.cygnus.com> <20000720135729.B6994@lucon.org> <200007202246.PAA15150@localhost.cygnus.com> <20000720155245.A7435@lucon.org> <200007202312.QAA15206@localhost.cygnus.com> <20000720170946.A7711@lucon.org> <200007210327.UAA15433@localhost.cygnus.com> <20000720211454.A8469@lucon.org> <200007210621.XAA00419@localhost.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-07/msg00350.html On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:21:12PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote: > > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:14:54 -0700 > > From: "H . J . Lu" > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 08:27:31PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote: > > > I know I _can_ use it, but when do I _have_ to use it? What would go > > > wrong if the linker never emitted any of these tags? > > > The reason I added the support is Ulrich wanted DF_1_NODELETE for > > libpthread.so. > ... > > So shouldn't we only use the new tags if the user specifies -z > nodelete (or whatever it is)? Yes, that is how it works. The new dtags will be generated only by either -z xxxxx or --enable-new-dtags. H.J.