From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Jason Eckhardt <jle@cygnus.com>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 04:35:00 -0000
Message-id: <200007311135.NAA10259@hawking.suse.de>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000730143408.4267A@cse.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-07/msg00497.html

Jason Eckhardt <jle@cygnus.com> writes:

|> These are new BFD_RELOC_*'s for i860.
|> 
|> Are bfd-in2.h and libbfd.h the only regens I need to do for a change to
|> reloc.c?
|> 
|> 2000-07-30  Jason Eckhardt  <jle@cygnus.com>
|> 
|>         * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860.
|>         * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate.
|> 
|> 
|> Index: bfd/reloc.c
|> ===================================================================
|> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
|> retrieving revision 1.27
|> diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 reloc.c
|> *** reloc.c	2000/07/20 16:21:07	1.27
|> --- reloc.c	2000/07/30 21:32:21
|> *************** ENUMDOC
|> *** 2912,2917 ****
|> --- 2912,2988 ----
|>     These relocs are only used within the CRIS assembler.  They are not
|>     (at present) written to any object files.
|>   
|> + ENUM
|> +   BFD_RELOC_860_NONE
|> + ENUMX
|> +   BFD_RELOC_860_32

In which way are these different from BFD_RELOC_NONE and BFD_RELOC_32,
resp.?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg