Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860

Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Jason,

: 2000-07-30  Jason Eckhardt  <jle@cygnus.com>
: 
:         * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860.
:         * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate.

Approved.

Modulo the _NONE and _32 ones of course :-)

Cheers
	Nick

Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860

[Jason Eckhardt]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> |>   
> |> + ENUM
> |> +   BFD_RELOC_860_NONE
> |> + ENUMX
> |> +   BFD_RELOC_860_32
> 
> In which way are these different from BFD_RELOC_NONE and BFD_RELOC_32,
> resp.?

  They aren't. I was just madly copying away from the ABI doc. Of course,
  I'll terminate these two before checking in.

Re: [patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860

[Andreas Schwab]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1210 bytes --]

Jason Eckhardt <jle@cygnus.com> writes:

|> These are new BFD_RELOC_*'s for i860.
|> 
|> Are bfd-in2.h and libbfd.h the only regens I need to do for a change to
|> reloc.c?
|> 
|> 2000-07-30  Jason Eckhardt  <jle@cygnus.com>
|> 
|>         * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860.
|>         * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate.
|> 
|> 
|> Index: bfd/reloc.c
|> ===================================================================
|> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
|> retrieving revision 1.27
|> diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 reloc.c
|> *** reloc.c	2000/07/20 16:21:07	1.27
|> --- reloc.c	2000/07/30 21:32:21
|> *************** ENUMDOC
|> *** 2912,2917 ****
|> --- 2912,2988 ----
|>     These relocs are only used within the CRIS assembler.  They are not
|>     (at present) written to any object files.
|>   
|> + ENUM
|> +   BFD_RELOC_860_NONE
|> + ENUMX
|> +   BFD_RELOC_860_32

In which way are these different from BFD_RELOC_NONE and BFD_RELOC_32,
resp.?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg

[patch] bfd, new bfd_relocs for i860

[Jason Eckhardt]

These are new BFD_RELOC_*'s for i860.

Are bfd-in2.h and libbfd.h the only regens I need to do for a change to
reloc.c?

2000-07-30  Jason Eckhardt  <jle@cygnus.com>

        * bfd/reloc.c (BFD_RELOC_860_*): New bfd relocs for i860.
        * bfd/bfd-in2.h, libbfd.h: Regenerate.


Index: bfd/reloc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/reloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -c -3 -p -r1.27 reloc.c
*** reloc.c	2000/07/20 16:21:07	1.27
--- reloc.c	2000/07/30 21:32:21
*************** ENUMDOC
*** 2912,2917 ****
--- 2912,2988 ----
    These relocs are only used within the CRIS assembler.  They are not
    (at present) written to any object files.
  
+ ENUM
+   BFD_RELOC_860_NONE
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_32
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_COPY
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_GLOB_DAT
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_JUMP_SLOT
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_RELATIVE
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_PC26
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_PLT26
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_PC16
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOW0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOW1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOW2
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPLIT2
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOW3
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOT0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOT0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOT1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOT1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOTOFF0
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_SPGOTOFF1
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF2
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOGOTOFF3
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_LOPC
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HIGHADJ
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HAGOT
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HAGOTOFF
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HAPC
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HIGH
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HIGOT
+ ENUMX
+   BFD_RELOC_860_HIGOTOFF
+ ENUMDOC
+   Intel i860 Relocations.
+ 
  ENDSENUM
    BFD_RELOC_UNUSED
  CODE_FRAGMENT