* "make check" failures with ia64-linux
@ 2001-05-25 17:30 H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-25 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas
FAIL: elf ehopt0
FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
In binutils
FAIL: readelf -s
There used to be no failures with ia64-linux.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>]
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux [not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au> @ 2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu 2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra 2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-27 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amodra; +Cc: binutils On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:21PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 05:30:30PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas > > > > FAIL: elf ehopt0 > > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err > > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err > > > > In binutils > > > > FAIL: readelf -s > > > > There used to be no failures with ia64-linux. > > Can you pinpoint when the failures started occurring? My changes > to symbol resolution dating back to 2001-03-30 might have > destabilised the assembler. The last working one is 2.11.90.0.1, which is based on CVS of Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has FAIL: readelf -s 2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has FAIL: readelf -s FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err ehopt0 was added on May 14. It looks like /export/build/gnu/binutils/build-ia64-linux/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -s -j .eh_frame dump.o > dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp "^ 0+010 (01|00)0000(00|01) (12|00)0000(00|12) (18|00)0000(00|18) 00000000 .*$" line " 0010 01000000 18000000 18000000 00000000 ................" regexp_diff match failure regexp "^ 0+020 (08|00)0000(00|08) 04(08|00)0000 (00|08)44 .*$" line " 0020 08000000 04000000 08000000 44000000 ............D..." FAIL: elf ehopt0 Sorry I don't have more time for ia64. H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux 2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra 2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu 2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: amodra @ 2001-05-27 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H . J . Lu; +Cc: binutils On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:58:10AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:21PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote: > > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 05:30:30PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas > > > > > > FAIL: elf ehopt0 > > > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err > > > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err > > > > > > In binutils > > > > > > FAIL: readelf -s > > > > > > There used to be no failures with ia64-linux. > > > > Can you pinpoint when the failures started occurring? My changes > > to symbol resolution dating back to 2001-03-30 might have > > destabilised the assembler. > > The last working one is 2.11.90.0.1, which is based on CVS of > Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has > > FAIL: readelf -s Grin. Turns out this one is due to 2001-03-30 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> * binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run on more ELF targets. So the readelf failure actually predates my messing around with symbol evaluation. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux 2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra @ 2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-27 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amodra; +Cc: binutils On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:52:38PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote: > > > > FAIL: readelf -s > > Grin. Turns out this one is due to > > 2001-03-30 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> > > * binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run on more ELF targets. > > So the readelf failure actually predates my messing around with > symbol evaluation. Than, someone who works on ia64 has to look into it :-). H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux 2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu 2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra @ 2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France 2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: George France @ 2001-05-28 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H . J . Lu, amodra; +Cc: binutils Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has > > FAIL: readelf -s > > 2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has > > FAIL: readelf -s > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err > I have the same failures on Alpha. --George ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux 2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France @ 2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-28 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: George France; +Cc: amodra, binutils On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:23:01PM -0400, George France wrote: > Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has > > > > FAIL: readelf -s > > > > 2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has > > > > FAIL: readelf -s > > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err > > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err > > > > I have the same failures on Alpha. My cross binutils from Linux/ia32 to Linux/alpha passed "make check". H.J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-28 19:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-25 17:30 "make check" failures with ia64-linux H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>
2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).