* "make check" failures with ia64-linux
@ 2001-05-25 17:30 H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-25 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas
FAIL: elf ehopt0
FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
In binutils
FAIL: readelf -s
There used to be no failures with ia64-linux.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux
[not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>
@ 2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-27 0:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amodra; +Cc: binutils
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:21PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 05:30:30PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas
> >
> > FAIL: elf ehopt0
> > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
> > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
> >
> > In binutils
> >
> > FAIL: readelf -s
> >
> > There used to be no failures with ia64-linux.
>
> Can you pinpoint when the failures started occurring? My changes
> to symbol resolution dating back to 2001-03-30 might have
> destabilised the assembler.
The last working one is 2.11.90.0.1, which is based on CVS of
Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has
FAIL: readelf -s
2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has
FAIL: readelf -s
FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
ehopt0 was added on May 14. It looks like
/export/build/gnu/binutils/build-ia64-linux/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -s -j .eh_frame dump.o > dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 0+010 (01|00)0000(00|01) (12|00)0000(00|12) (18|00)0000(00|18) 00000000 .*$"
line " 0010 01000000 18000000 18000000 00000000 ................"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ 0+020 (08|00)0000(00|08) 04(08|00)0000 (00|08)44 .*$"
line " 0020 08000000 04000000 08000000 44000000 ............D..."
FAIL: elf ehopt0
Sorry I don't have more time for ia64.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux
2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu
@ 2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: amodra @ 2001-05-27 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H . J . Lu; +Cc: binutils
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:58:10AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:21:21PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 05:30:30PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > I got 4 "make check" failures with ia64-linux. In gas
> > >
> > > FAIL: elf ehopt0
> > > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
> > > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
> > >
> > > In binutils
> > >
> > > FAIL: readelf -s
> > >
> > > There used to be no failures with ia64-linux.
> >
> > Can you pinpoint when the failures started occurring? My changes
> > to symbol resolution dating back to 2001-03-30 might have
> > destabilised the assembler.
>
> The last working one is 2.11.90.0.1, which is based on CVS of
> Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has
>
> FAIL: readelf -s
Grin. Turns out this one is due to
2001-03-30 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
* binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run on more ELF targets.
So the readelf failure actually predates my messing around with
symbol evaluation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux
2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
@ 2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-27 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amodra; +Cc: binutils
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:52:38PM +0930, amodra@one.net.au wrote:
> >
> > FAIL: readelf -s
>
> Grin. Turns out this one is due to
>
> 2001-03-30 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
>
> * binutils-all/readelf.exp: Run on more ELF targets.
>
> So the readelf failure actually predates my messing around with
> symbol evaluation.
Than, someone who works on ia64 has to look into it :-).
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux
2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
@ 2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: George France @ 2001-05-28 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H . J . Lu, amodra; +Cc: binutils
Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has
>
> FAIL: readelf -s
>
> 2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has
>
> FAIL: readelf -s
> FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
> FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
>
I have the same failures on Alpha.
--George
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: "make check" failures with ia64-linux
2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
@ 2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-05-28 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: George France; +Cc: amodra, binutils
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:23:01PM -0400, George France wrote:
> Mar 9, 2001. 2.11.90.0.4 based on Apr. 1, 2001 has
> >
> > FAIL: readelf -s
> >
> > 2.11.90.0.5 based on Apr. 14, 2001 has
> >
> > FAIL: readelf -s
> > FAIL: ia64 dv-raw-err
> > FAIL: ia64 dv-waw-err
> >
>
> I have the same failures on Alpha.
My cross binutils from Linux/ia32 to Linux/alpha passed "make check".
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-28 19:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-25 17:30 "make check" failures with ia64-linux H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <20010526232121.E10344@squeak.one.net.au>
2001-05-27 0:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-27 7:15 ` amodra
2001-05-27 9:51 ` H . J . Lu
2001-05-28 19:23 ` George France
2001-05-28 19:33 ` H . J . Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).