From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, philb@gnu.org, amodra@one.net.au, nickc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: "Warning: size of symbol FOO changed from X to Y in OBJ"
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 11:23:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010531112349.A16379@lucon.org>
References: <E154zoQ-0001C9-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <sik82y4v73.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010531093417.A12542@squeak.one.net.au> <sivgmitjal.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010530210155.A2955@lucon.org> <sig0dmt3dm.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010531001430.A5977@lucon.org> <sibsoat1y6.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010531093515.A14403@lucon.org> <si4ru1pgqk.fsf@daffy.airs.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00556.html

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:31:47AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> I suppose it's conceivable that setting the symbol size to the smaller
> size could cause a bug.  But I can't think of any case in which that
> would happen.  So I would want more than speculation.
> 

Me too. I'd like to see a testcase for such a warning.


H.J.