From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Thiemo Seufer Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Code cleanup in tc-mips.c Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:58:00 -0000 Message-id: <20010821165834.A11007@lucon.org> References: <20010821211500.G30301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <998423376.1308.1.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20010821221411.I30301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <998431885.1329.3.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> <20010822002743.L30301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20010821153610.A9816@lucon.org> <20010822012500.O30301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00502.html On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 01:25:00AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > H . J . Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:27:43AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > > > > > Try to test with the compiler if possible too. > > > > > > I currently try to get CVS gcc working on mips64-linux. > > > > > > > What ABI do you use for mips64-linux? I think it may be a good idea > > to use the SGI 64bit ABI. > > I dislike the symbol sorting, and little endian support might be a Me either. > good thing also, so I used elf64-tradbigmips, not elf64-bigmips. The little endian support is not a major issue. > > > It is documented. I think it may have better > > support in gcc than other 64bit misp ABI. > > Old ECOFF isn't even an issue. Did you mean something else? The SGI 64bit ABI corrected a few mistakes in the 32bit SVR4 MIPS ABI. But it also has other stuff we may not need. I have a wish list for a 64bit MIPS ABI. > > BTW, all my emails sent to you are blocked. I have to send it to the binutils mailing list. H.J.