From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix MIPS ELF64 relocation howtos
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:23:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010827132334.A11521@lucon.org>
References: <20010827023751.B301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20010826175030.B2794@lucon.org> <20010827030223.C301@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20010827113213.A9485@lucon.org> <20010827204358.C4669@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20010827120012.A10036@lucon.org> <20010827214105.E4669@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <998943123.1210.2.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00645.html

On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 01:12:03PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> 
> > I doubt anybody actually uses o64. I found several places in
> > binutils where it is broken or only partially implemented.
> > 
> 
> Actually, I believe that the mips64-elf compiler uses o64 by default. I
> could verify, but not at the moment :)

It doesn't mean much. As far as I know, the most interesting stuff in
an ELF ABI is the dynamic binary support. In fact, an ELF ABI may not
even cover static binaries. I doubt mips64-elf supports the dynamic
binaries.


H.J.