From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix distinction of 32/64bit addresses in MIPS gas
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:25:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010901032515.B4969@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <20010825032615.E309@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <wvnr8ts1ddl.fsf@talisman.cambridge.redhat.com> <20010831181657.A17249@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <200108311711.KAA19709@geoffk.org> <20010831193107.A10362@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <mailpost.999279120.2469@postal.sibyte.com> <yov51yls6sgi.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <20010831204556.C17249@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <3B900662.3040502@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00748.html

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >I'm talking about:
> >
> >SYSTEM V APPLICATION BINARY INTERFACE
> >MIPS RISC Processor Supplement
> >3rd Edition
> >
> >where no such relocation is defined.
> 
> Keep in mind that there is often a gap between a standard and the real 
> (aka embedded) world.

The embedded world isn't everything. :-)

> I can't see how a non SysV MIPS ABI can be 
> expected to comply with a SysV standard.

AFAICS this use of R_MIPS_64 isn't covered by any ABI.


Thiemo