From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix distinction of 32/64bit addresses in MIPS gas
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:08:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010906200826.F2210@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <200108311711.KAA19709@geoffk.org> <20010831193107.A10362@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <mailpost.999279120.2469@postal.sibyte.com> <yov51yls6sgi.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <20010831204556.C17249@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <mailpost.999283589.5294@postal.sibyte.com> <yov5ofow585q.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <20010831143107.A4532@lucon.org> <yov51ylnbia1.fsf@highland.sibyte.com> <20010906105014.A32456@lucon.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00053.html

H . J . Lu wrote:
[snip]
> > > What is the 32bit address of `foo'?
> > 
> > bit 31 may or may not be set, depending on what exactly you're
> > compiling.
> 
> Let me get this. Correct me if I am wrong. It seems that you want
> to use 64bit registers in an o32 binary. Am I right?

1/2. They take o32 as a hull and fill it with 64bit code. There is
no ABI conformance at all.


Thiemo