* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
[not found] ` <200110231042.f9NAgLQ30274@ns.caldera.de>
@ 2001-10-23 7:28 ` H . J . Lu
2001-10-23 8:33 ` DJ Delorie
2001-10-24 3:47 ` Stephan Kulow
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-10-23 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephan Kulow; +Cc: binutils, gcc
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:38:21PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 October 2001 02:59, you wrote:
> > This is the beta release of binutils 2.11.92.0.10 for Linux, which is
> > based on binutils 2001 1021 in CVS on sourecware.cygnus.com plus
> > various changes. It is purely for Linux.
>
> Hi!
>
> Does anything speak against using libtool for libiberty too? After all the
> shared libs support and the linking and all that are already in there and
> it has support for convenient libraries - and all for free.
>
> I already patched my version of binutils but I would clean it up, if you find
> it acceptable
I support it. Send it to the gcc/binutils mailing list. I don't want to
add more changes to my binutils unless it is absolute nesssary.
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
2001-10-23 7:28 ` The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released H . J . Lu
@ 2001-10-23 8:33 ` DJ Delorie
2001-10-23 8:39 ` Stephan Kulow
2001-10-24 3:47 ` Stephan Kulow
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2001-10-23 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: coolo, binutils, gcc
> Does anything speak against using libtool for libiberty too?
Note that the topic of a shared libiberty comes up once in a while.
It is technically possible to create a shared libiberty, but there are
tactical problems with using a shared libiberty that have yet to be
resolved. A search of the archives should turn up many arguments on
both sides.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
2001-10-23 8:33 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2001-10-23 8:39 ` Stephan Kulow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Kulow @ 2001-10-23 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie, binutils, gcc
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 17:32, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Does anything speak against using libtool for libiberty too?
>
> Note that the topic of a shared libiberty comes up once in a while.
> It is technically possible to create a shared libiberty, but there are
> tactical problems with using a shared libiberty that have yet to be
> resolved. A search of the archives should turn up many arguments on
> both sides.
I don't want to do a shared library. I want to use libtool to create a
convenience library that is linked later into the applications and libraries
using.
Greetings, Stephan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
[not found] <20011022175956.A794@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <200110231042.f9NAgLQ30274@ns.caldera.de>
@ 2001-10-23 20:56 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2001-10-23 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hjl; +Cc: binutils
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:59:56 -0700
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> Changes from binutils 2.11.92.0.7:
> 3. Fix the ELF/cris linker.
Is this what your change to elf32-cris.c on 2001-10-21 is
supposed to accomplish? Or is it something unrelated?
Proper bug-report, please.
brgds, H-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
2001-10-23 7:28 ` The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released H . J . Lu
2001-10-23 8:33 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2001-10-24 3:47 ` Stephan Kulow
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Kulow @ 2001-10-24 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1212 bytes --]
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 16:28, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:38:21PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 October 2001 02:59, you wrote:
> > > This is the beta release of binutils 2.11.92.0.10 for Linux, which is
> > > based on binutils 2001 1021 in CVS on sourecware.cygnus.com plus
> > > various changes. It is purely for Linux.
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Does anything speak against using libtool for libiberty too? After all
> > the shared libs support and the linking and all that are already in there
> > and it has support for convenient libraries - and all for free.
> >
> > I already patched my version of binutils but I would clean it up, if you
> > find it acceptable
>
> I support it. Send it to the gcc/binutils mailing list. I don't want to
> add more changes to my binutils unless it is absolute nesssary.
>
Hi!
I've checked the binutils from CVS and there is a lot more than binutils in
there and I'm not sure how to build it all. The binutils part of it should
build though. The patch includes also parts of created files as they are
in CVS.
Please test it (especially on the cygwin platform I'm not sure if it will work
the way it worked before).
Greetings, Stephan
[-- Attachment #2: libtool-libiberty.patch.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 60595 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released.
@ 2001-10-23 10:48 Jack Howarth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jack Howarth @ 2001-10-23 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: coolo, binutils
Stephen,
While this isn't directly related to your question on libtool,
I would note that the special branch ('multi-language'?) of libtool
that you use (for at least kdebase) is very broken. It uses -nostdlib
but isn't smart enough to actually know what is being left out by that.
This caused significant breakage on the ppc with the kcontrol sharedlibs
because they needed symbols from libgcc which your custom libtool was
suppressing with -nostdlib.
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack W. Howarth, Ph.D. 231 Albert Sabin Way
NMR Facility Director Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0524
Dept. of Molecular Genetics phone: (513) 558-4420
Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine fax: (513) 558-8474
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-24 3:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20011022175956.A794@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <200110231042.f9NAgLQ30274@ns.caldera.de>
2001-10-23 7:28 ` The Linux binutils 2.11.92.0.10 is released H . J . Lu
2001-10-23 8:33 ` DJ Delorie
2001-10-23 8:39 ` Stephan Kulow
2001-10-24 3:47 ` Stephan Kulow
2001-10-23 20:56 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2001-10-23 10:48 Jack Howarth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).