From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2002 21:19:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25932 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 21:19:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.ACT-Europe.FR) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 21:19:16 -0000 Received: from paris.ACT-Europe.FR (paris.int.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.140]) by dublin.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2458122A126; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:19:15 +0100 (MET) Received: by paris.ACT-Europe.FR (Postfix, from userid 527) id 7B6DA2264C; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:19:14 +0100 (CET) To: binutils@sources.redhat.com, danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz Subject: binutils, why default stack size this low ? Message-Id: <20020116211914.7B6DA2264C@paris.ACT-Europe.FR> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:32:00 -0000 From: obry@ACT-Europe.FR (Pascal Obry) X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 Hello, We have seen that the default stack size for the binutils on Windows has been reduced to 0x200000 (2 mb). Why this have been set so low. We have seen regressions on some (not so big) Ada code because of this change. The change has been done on 2001-06-05: << 2001-06-05 Danny Smith * emultempl/pe.em (init): Reduce default stack reserve to 0x200000. >> Previous version was 0x2000000 (32 mb). Note that we are talking about stack reserve, nothing is commited as Windows does commit on use. Pascal Obry.