From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-14944-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31231 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2002 21:22:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31079 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 21:22:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO delorie.com) (207.22.48.162)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 21:22:52 -0000
Received: from envy.delorie.com (envy.delorie.com [207.22.48.171])
	by delorie.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id g0GLMpW05488;
	Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:22:51 -0500
Received: (from dj@localhost)
	by envy.delorie.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g0GLMob14578;
	Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:22:50 -0500
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:03:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200201162122.g0GLMob14578@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com>
To: obry@ACT-Europe.FR
CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz
In-reply-to: <20020116211914.7B6DA2264C@paris.ACT-Europe.FR>
	(obry@ACT-Europe.FR)
Subject: Re: binutils, why default stack size this low ?
References:  <20020116211914.7B6DA2264C@paris.ACT-Europe.FR>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2


Larger reserves limited the number of threads you could start.  The
MSVC compiler had a much smaller reserve than Cygwin before the patch.