From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-15049-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20571 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 16:50:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20540 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 16:50:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ocean.lucon.org) (12.234.19.19)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 16:50:55 -0000
Received: by ocean.lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 60047125C0; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:50:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:04:00 -0000
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 2.12 update
Message-ID: <20020121085053.A25933@lucon.org>
References: <20020119002645.A21761@nevyn.them.org> <u8sn91tixo.fsf@gromit.moeb> <20020120112017.B6918@lucon.org> <ho4rlfu7rw.fsf@gee.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <ho4rlfu7rw.fsf@gee.suse.de>; from aj@suse.de on Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:56:51PM +0100
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00425.txt.bz2

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> 
> >> I still see the following on x86-64:
> >> /opt/x86-64/x86_64-unknown-linux/bin/ld: tclExecute.o: access beyond end of merged section (-4 + 0)
> >> 
> >> But haven't tracked it down - and expect it's - as HJ mentioned - a
> >> generic bug.
> >
> > Can you duplicate it on x86?

Than that may be an x86-64 specific bug.


H.J.