From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-15274-listarch-binutils=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15698 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2002 13:57:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15656 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 13:57:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 13:57:03 -0000
Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id NAA29228; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:57:01 GMT
Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5)
	id xma029146; Wed, 30 Jan 02 13:56:55 GMT
Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00380;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:56:55 GMT
Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18])
	by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02736;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:56:54 GMT
Message-Id: <200201301356.NAA02736@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
        binutils@sources.redhat.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: Possibly unnecessary differences in messages 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:50:34 +0100."
             <20020130145034.F5439@jeffreys.suse.de> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:12:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00650.txt.bz2

> * Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha@arm.com) [20020129 19:35]:
> 
> > > so, the messages should be identical, and the only question would be which
> > > of the two should be used.
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Damn, I should have been more precise ;-) Which wording should I use?
> 'because the non-interworking code in %s has been copied into it' or
> 'because non-interworking code in %s has been linked with it' ?
> 
> To me at least the second looks like the better choice.

Agreed.

R.