From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20283 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2002 14:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20243 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 14:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 14:15:48 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id OAA19067; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:15:46 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma018344; Wed, 30 Jan 02 14:15:14 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02982; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:15:13 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04249; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:15:13 GMT Message-Id: <200201301415.OAA04249@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Philipp Thomas cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Nick Clifton , binutils@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unify messages in coff-arm.c and elf32-arm.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:12:20 GMT." <200201301412.OAA04072@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 06:24:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00653.txt.bz2 > > OK, here is my attempt at unifying the messages in those two files. Can I > > check it in? > > OK, but: > > > @@ -2461,7 +2461,8 @@ coff_arm_copy_private_bfd_data (src, des > > if (INTERWORK_FLAG (dest)) > > { > > /* xgettext:c-format */ > > - _bfd_error_handler (("Warning: Clearing the interworking bit of %s, because the non-interworking code in %s has been copied into it"), > > + _bfd_error_handler (("\ > > +Warning: Clearing the interworking flag of %s, because non-interworking code in %s has been linked with it"), > > Leave out the comma, you already have in the other file. > > R. > One other thing. Why have you switched to "interworking *bit*"? I think flag was clearer. R.