From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22557 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 00:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22535 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 00:58:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06bw.bigpond.com) (139.134.6.96) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 00:58:43 -0000 Received: from bubble.local ([144.135.24.84]) by mta06bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta06bw Feb 26 2002 03:44:21) with SMTP id GW8DDT00.HHX for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 10:58:41 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-136-176-14.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.136.176.14]) by bwmam06.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0m 53/3278623); 17 May 2002 10:58:41 Received: (qmail 1495 invoked by uid 179); 17 May 2002 00:58:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:58:00 -0000 From: Alan Modra To: Jeffrey Stephens Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Newbie Question Message-ID: <20020517005841.GC2423@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> Mail-Followup-To: Jeffrey Stephens , binutils@sources.redhat.com References: <3CE3DA98.1D1B7915@tampabay.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CE3DA98.1D1B7915@tampabay.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 12:13:12PM -0400, Jeffrey Stephens wrote: > I was wondering, in light of my upgrading GCC, if I should also upgrade > binutils to 2.12? And, if so, should I install the new binutils before > or after installing gcc-3.1? Upgrading and installing binutils before compiling gcc (or compiling with a combined source tree), will enable new gcc features. You should use binutils 2.12.1, now that it's out. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre